Toronto-based Canada Pension Plan
Investment Board has expanded its climate disclosures, adding portfolio-level
indicators for carbon intensity and corporate transition governance.
The new framework gives investors a point-in-time view of how
CPP Investments’ holdings compare across two climate-related dimensions. It
builds on portfolio carbon footprint reporting that the fund has published
since 2018.
The additional disclosure covers CPP Investments’ C$787 billion
investment portfolio as of March 31, 2026, excluding government-issued
securities.
“Our investment strategy remains focused on delivering long-term value to help ensure the Canada Pension Plan’s financial sustainability for many generations. We consider material risks, including climate-related risks and opportunities, to support risk-adjusted returns over decades. We know that progress towards a lower-carbon future will not be linear, and we are committed to continued transparency as we invest across sectors and work with companies to reduce risk and preserve value,” said John Graham, President & CEO, CPP Investments.

John Graham, President & CEO, CPP Investments
CPP Investments measures carbon intensity using Scope 1 and
Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions relative to enterprise value.
The methodology uses the Partnership for Carbon Accounting
Financials metric of tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per $1 million of
Enterprise Value Including Cash.
CPP Investments established a threshold of 40 tCO₂e/$M EVIC. Its analysis draws on S&P
Global LargeMid Cap data, industry classifications and definitions from the
International Energy Agency and Transition Pathway Initiative.
The threshold is designed to help identify assets in
harder-to-abate industries or those with elevated carbon intensity.
CPP Investments cautioned against treating the threshold as a
definitive climate risk classification. Companies below it may still have
significant emissions or transition risk. Those above it are not automatically
considered high-risk investments.
At March 31, 2026, 86.7% of the portfolio was below the
threshold.
Transition
governance becomes a second indicator
The framework also assesses whether portfolio companies show
evidence of transition governance and planning.
Companies are classified as “Confirmed” when they meet at least
one of three criteria. These include approved Science Based Targets initiative
targets, a Transition Pathway Initiative Level 4 or 5 rating, or participation
in CPP Investments’ Decarbonization Investment Approach.
Among investments classified as having confirmed evidence, 83.5%
were covered through SBTi or TPI indicators. CPP Investments’ own
Decarbonization Investment Approach accounted for the remaining 16.5%.
Holdings without confirmed evidence are classified as “Unconfirmed.”
That category can also include companies where external data is unavailable or
an assessment has not yet been completed.
“CPP Investments’ investment approach continues to be grounded in disciplined underwriting, active ownership and a belief that the transition to a lower-carbon economy will unfold unevenly across sectors and regions. Because companies will respond differently to these changes, this disclosure provides additional transparency into carbon intensity and transition governance indicators across our portfolio of assets while remaining consistent with our mandate and climate change principles,” said Richard Manley, Chief Sustainability Officer, CPP Investments.

CPP Investments plans to disclose the indicators annually
alongside its existing portfolio carbon footprint.
Results may move as valuations, portfolio composition, emissions
data and company transition strategies change. The pension investor also
stressed that the framework does not determine whether individual companies are
successfully implementing transition plans.
Importantly, CPP Investments is not setting fixed
portfolio-level targets for the new categories or its wider carbon footprint.
That approach differs from asset owners that use portfolio
decarbonization targets to steer capital allocation. CPP Investments argues
that flexibility allows it to invest across industries while engaging companies
facing different transition pathways.
For executives and investors, the disclosure reflects a broader
shift toward more granular climate-risk reporting. Carbon emissions alone
provide an incomplete view of transition exposure. Governance, credible targets
and management preparedness are increasingly part of institutional investment
analysis.
CPP Investments’ approach keeps financial materiality at the
centre of that assessment. As one of the world’s largest institutional
investors, its reporting choices may also influence expectations for
transparency across global pension and sovereign investment portfolios.
Source : esgnews.com